That’s an excellent theological and moral comparison — both themes share striking conceptual parallels in the Qur’an. Here’s a scholarly way to express the correlation and similarity:
Analytical version:
In the Qur’an, the punishment for engaging in usury (riba) and the condemnation of consuming the property of orphans unjustly share a profound thematic similarity: both are portrayed as grave moral transgressions that invite severe divine retribution. In both cases, the offender is depicted as metaphorically “devouring fire,” emphasizing the spiritual corruption and destructive consequences of unjust economic behavior.
Concise version:
The Qur’an draws a parallel between those who consume usury and those who unjustly seize the property of orphans, portraying both as consuming fire — a vivid image underscoring the moral gravity of exploiting the vulnerable.
Burada yeni gibi görünüyorsunuz. Eğer katılmak istiyorsanız düğmelerden birine tıklayınız.
Yorumlar
Of course. This is a profound and insightful question that gets to the heart of the Quran's ethical and economic worldview. The correlation between the prohibition of Riba (often translated as "usury" or "interest") and the prohibition of unjustly consuming the property of orphans is exceptionally strong in the Quranic framework.
They are not just two separate sins; they are presented as parallel and equally egregious violations of social and economic justice, rooted in the same core spiritual disease: the predatory exploitation of the vulnerable for personal gain.
Here’s a detailed breakdown of the correlation:
1. Direct Linguistic and Contextual Link in the Quran
The most powerful evidence for this correlation comes from the verses themselves, where the two prohibitions are often mentioned in close succession.
The correlation goes beyond mere proximity in the text. They share fundamental ethical principles:
Feature Consuming Orphan's Property Unjustly Dealing in Riba (Interest)
Exploitation of Vulnerability The orphan is the archetype of the vulnerable, defenseless member of society who lacks a protector. The debtor in a Riba-based contract is typically in a position of need. The lender exploits this need to generate unearned wealth.
Unjust Enrichment / Unearned Gain The guardian consumes wealth they did not work for or have a right to. It is a form of theft from the defenseless. The lender gains an increase (interest) on the loan without engaging in any productive, risk-sharing economic activity. The gain is divorced from real economic effort.
Corruption of Trust The guardian is in a position of sacred trust (amanah). Violating this trust is a double sin. A financial transaction should be based on justice and fairness. Riba corrupts this relationship into one of predation.
Systemic Injustice Widespread misuse of orphan wealth destroys the family structure and social trust, leading to a cycle of poverty and resentment. Riba concentrates wealth in the hands of the already wealthy lenders and crushes borrowers, leading to immense social inequality and instability.
Divine Punishment Both are repeatedly threatened with severe, hellfire punishment, indicating their gravity in the sight of God. The language of "consuming fire" is used for both.
3. The Underlying Spiritual Disease
The Quran diagnoses the root cause of both sins as:
Conclusion
The correlation is not coincidental but fundamental. In the Quranic view:
Consuming an orphan's property is the microcosm of economic injustice, a personal crime against a single, identifiable victim within one's own household.
Dealing in Riba is the macrocosm of economic injustice, an institutionalized, systemic crime that preys on the vulnerable in society at large.
By condemning both in the strongest possible terms and linking them conceptually, the Quran is building a comprehensive ethical economic system. This system is founded on the principles of justice (adl), mercy (rahmah), protecting the vulnerable, and ensuring that wealth circulates fairly and is earned through legitimate trade and effort, not through exploitation and predation. One is a sin against the individual, the other a sin against the system, but both spring from the same poisoned root.